Is HIIT Better Than Steady-State Cardio?
September 11, 2015 | By Vima | No Comments
High intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as one of the most popular workout methods available today. From celebrities to fitness gurus and athletes, everyone is praising the health benefits of HIIT. According to researchers, this form of exercise increases metabolism, preserves muscle, and burns fat. Compared to regular cardio, it produces better results in less time.
What Makes HIIT So Effective
This workout method alternates shorts, intense bursts of exercise with low intensity exercise. It can be applied to most activities, such as running, sprinting, treadmill walking, stair climbing, and even strength training. For example, you can run fast for 30 seconds, walk for 60 seconds, and then run for another 30 seconds. A typical HIIT workout can last anywhere from three minutes to 20 minutes.
Studies have found that high intensity interval training burns more calories per minute than any other workout method. It also improves insulin sensitivity, increases aerobic capacity, and helps build lean muscle. The best part is that you’ll get dramatic results without spending more time in the gym.
HIIT vs. Steady State Cardio
HIIT is considered a better alternative to steady state cardio due to its ability to preserve muscle and speed up metabolism. When done in excess, regular cardio can even decrease your metabolism and raise stress hormone levels, leading to weight gain. It also causes muscle loss and puts stress on your joints. High intensity interval training does exactly the opposite.
Additionally, this training method offers athletes and experienced lifters a new challenge. Whether you’re new to exercise or have years of practice behind your back, you can benefit from HIIT. For best results, do three weekly workouts. Mix HIIT with strength training to shed fat and gain lean muscle. Don’t forget to eat clean and watch your portions. Not even the best workout routine can compensate for poor nutrition.
Submit a Comment